Search
Loading
Newsletter
Latest Post:
Featured Jobs
Featured Firm

View All
Add Listing
« Student Spotlight: Omega Gi | Main | Fuel the Love »
Tuesday
Mar152011

Before & After: Caribou Coffee Bags

03_15_11_caribou.jpg

"The redesign of the Caribou Coffee brand and logo can now be found on its coffee bags nationwide. Caribou Coffee launched an extensive brand redesign last year that continues to roll out this year. The new coffee bag design now wraps the entire bag with burlap and labels that give the packaging more of a handcrafted and artisan feel. The front label for each specific coffee was kept simple and includes a small hand-rendered sketch that references the country of origin or the unique coffee blend inside the bag."

 

Designed by Colle+McVoy

 

Client: Caribou Coffee
Agency: Colle+McVoy
Executive Creative Director: Mike CaguinGroup
Creative Director: Ed Bennett, Erik Husband
Designers: Ed Bennett, Lindsey Aho, Andrew Wetzel, Ben Clymer, Bryce Hemmer
Illustrator: Ed Bennett
Writers:  Erik Husband, John Neerland, Steve Kaplan
Production Artists: Greg Goranson, Colleen Sabers
Print Producers: Brad Smith, Teresa Demma
Photographer (burlap and labels): Chris Sheehan

 

03_15_11_caribou1.jpg03_15_11_caribou2.jpg

BEFORE:

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (17)

If there is one thing I have a personal dislike of, it is where design is not true to the material. If you want the burlap look, then use burlap. If you mimic burlap, it just ends up looking fake. That, coupled with images of ripped paper, tags and stitching just makes for a packaging that's dripping with fake authenticity.
March 15, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterReuben
I still don't get the logo. I realize it's supposed to be a caribou, but I STILL don't see it. Their previous identity had the homey appeal of a lake cabin. This is predictable and slightly sterile.
March 15, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterSamantha
The logo is a complete loss.

Is the rooster drowning on green swampy water??
March 15, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterChava
I think the logo works great. Take a second more to look at it. It is a Caribou jumping with legs spread out and the antlers out the top of the head. The body is a coffee bean. Plus the post is about the new packaging, not the logo. I am sure the designer was stuck with using the current logo whether it was good or not.
March 15, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterjdesignedit
Where is the before - it says before and after in the title?
March 15, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterFrank
I KNOW the logo is a caribou leaping with, for some reason, a coffee bean in the mix. It just doesn't work. When I first saw it a year ago I had no idea it was a caribou. I saw the coffee bean and what looked like antlers but it is far too abstract to physically appear as a caribou--and they seemed to be reaching for a non-abstract representation of a caribou. And it IS about the logo. I'm not sure you can design something superb with a foundation as weak as their identity.
March 15, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterSamantha
If these packs were burlap with torn labels etc it would cost a small fortune to produce.

Part of packaging design is communication of a brand position. If they want to send out a message that they are wholesome and hand crafted then they've done a good job of achieving this. The packaging has been well executed and I'm sure looks great on shelf.
March 15, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterChris W
Is it just me or is there no BEFORE to this before and after post?
March 15, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterKatie
Their previous packaging reflected their previous logo and branding that followed the rustic log cabin feel.
Their new logo has a modern style...the new packaging reflects that old-world feel, which is a large contrast but an approach that many companies are finding these days with the old-style feel.
I’d feel a clean white bag with the colored bottoms and graphic would fit nicely BUT then it competes with all the other clean white bag coffees, Starbucks and store-brands that have picked up that look. This is a distinct look and will be easily spotted against the sea of other coffee bags. I don’t mind the fake burlap bag....nixing it because it is not real is like saying not to use textures on any packaging piece whether it is to make it look old or weathered when it really isn’t.

I like the packaging; I still DO NOT like the new logo. It has grown on me but wish they had updated the older one.
March 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterBJMRamage
Is this not a mimicry of Starbuck's burlap campaign? http://www.cornichon.org/2009/05/starbucks-sprea.html
March 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterLauren
Sorry guys, forgot the after image. Post has been updated!
March 16, 2011 | Registered CommenterAndrew Gibbs
Points like "I don't get it" weigh none in a valid critique. I don't get a lot of things...they might still make sense to others.

Staying true to material is another subjective view...come to think of it, you're right...I remember all those awesome websites using real burlap...whenever I visit them my monitor would turn so nice and farmy to the touch. :)

It's caribou coffee!!! Is anyone really gonna bitch about a logo having a caribou and coffee bean combined??

Nonetheless this package is weird at first, might look awesome in real life...and also might just grow on you. Or, whine some more and have it taken down like the Gap logo. :)
March 17, 2011 | Registered CommenterTibor Svajko
I like it. Ask me why
March 17, 2011 | Registered CommenterTibor Svajko
Must we forever reference the design calamity that was the rebranding of GAP, the repackaging of Tropicana? Let's come up with some new reference points, please.

And sure, maybe try to put trompe l'oeil out of it's misery. After centuries it's still not fooling anyone.
March 21, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterjefferson lives
I love this redesign! As someone who has been a patron of Caribou coffee for many years, the brand was well past due for a refresh. The burlap bag does convey a new brand philosophy without adding to the packaging cost.

I personally love the new logo. It makes complete sense to me. It maintains the spirit of the old logo with color and line cues for the current consumer while creating a more updated and streamlined brand mentality to a new generation of coffee enthusiasts.
March 22, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterNeztraDesign
If the overall goal was to make the packaging look a bit cartoonish and dim, the goal was partly executed. There are several elements that may and may not work. The content/presentation is there, but the layout, type, and positioning of elements is lacking which in turn offers a bit too much chaos going on over the bag.

As Katie stated in her previous post, white would have been beneficial, but then it would not compete well with the other bags utilizing white space on their packaging.

The Caribou Coffee is too big and wide for the placement at the top of the bag. Scaling down the logo would be more appealing and allow for better aesthetic placement with the front label. It looks as though the logo is competing with the coffee's descriptive label rather then complementing it.

The type used for the label heading and description is close to the "coffee" sub-text of the logo but differs vastly in the characters. With regards to the measuring diagram of "darker to bolder" it appears much too small and undefined; a consumer may not see that information off hand unless they're familiar with the brand. The use of hand drawn labels is a bit unique but not at all innovative. Abstracts appear on many coffee bags from silhouettes to fully drawn images.

Still, regarding type, they also use another handwritten typeface in the back of the packaging on the burlap as well as for the content. The handwritten font reminds me of the type used on the Starbucks paper bags for pastries. There is too much use of fonts going on here.

I understand the need to break away from the traditional coffee theme, but hand drawn labels may not be the way to go. One alternative to this may be to use images of how relevant coffee is to everyday life. Similar to what Rude Health has done http://www.brandpackaging.com/Articles/Feature_Articles/BNP_GUID_9-5-2006_A_10000000000001002330 (scroll down about midway).

Caribou's attempt at using burlap and torn paper along with stitching is a bit overdone on this packaging. From the drop shadow effects to the overlay of the blue in the logo and bottom of the packaging; it is too simplistic.

We have white torn paper with dark brown headings at the top, and tan torn paper with blue heading-backgrounds around the side and rear. This is getting too busy for something that could have been simplistic and robust.

For a more authentic and genuine feel of the bag, they should've went the route of Stmptown http://www.thedieline.com/blog/2009/2/25/stumptown-coffee-roasters.html

Use real burlap, or something close to it, but not a digital rendering.

With regards to the logo, I was not a big fan of it's revision about a year ago when I first saw it. They could've easily kept the mark (shown in the "before" picture) fully squared out the square, and tighten up the Caribou. Had they made their mark from then until know, they could've minimized the logo to it's iconic version by dropping the text as Starbucks has done. They could have also kept the Roast Degree Indicator from the previous packaging as well. A re-design should be functional, eye-appealing, and recognizable to the consumers and distributors of any product.

Scale the logo down for breathability, make the labels stronger, and clean the layout. This could actually work if done right.
March 27, 2011 | Registered Commenterzerimar3
The new packaging and logo are atrocious and deeply disappointing, as Caribou is a great company with a great product. If this is an exercise in product differentiation in a highly competitive market, it failed. Coca-cola too was a great company with a great product and faced stiff market competition ~ and they came out with New Coke. Like Coca-cola, Caribou has severely underestimated the power of its first brand.
July 18, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterDoc

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.