Student Spotlight: Multiply

"The assignment was to design the branding and package for a challenging consumer product. I chose toilet paper as a majority of consumers including myself struggle most often to find the details of the thickness/quality on the product package. My research showed me that most existing packages focus on the brand name, soft colors and comforting graphics, thereby making it difficult for the onlooker to get important details regarding the product from a distance."
Designed by Ekta Mody, New York, U.S.A.
Prof. Antonio Di Spigna
Graduate Communications Design, Pratt Institute
"I named the brand MULTIPLY, as toilet paper is available in a variety of thicknesses or plies that increase the hygiene and comfort value. Attempting to solve the simple issue of convenience for the buyer, I decided to focus on the info graphic 1ply, 2ply and 3ply. This series of 3 packs clearly identifies each quality at a single glance on the shelf while indicating the product itself through the visual language."



15 Comments | Posted on
Thursday, August 12, 2010 











Reader Comments (15)
I realize this is a student design but I feel it was well thought out.
Also, with that much ink coverage it isn't clear how many rolls are in the pack until you're able to be close enough to further read the package. The 5 x 5 rule: consumers should get their information by looking at a package in 5 seconds from 5 feet away; important to communicate what it is and how much of it there is in a quick read.
The colors are not traditional for the category, but will certainly give you differentiation at shelf - look like they'd be a match for a more eco-friendly pack (tissue made with higher percentages of recycled fiber).
Couldn't read the small type in the images, but hopefully it's the net quantity statement (size of individual sheets, square footage, etc) - there are fair packaging guidelines that need to be followed, and it is legally required to be a certain size based on the area of your principle display panels. It's not pretty and it's boring, but it is required though you can propose an aesthetically pleasing way of including it.
Would have loved to see the side and back panel treatments. Overall you're off to a good start; nice to see students tackling less glamorous products and giving their fresh eyes to the design.
Some slight tweaks will enable it to accomodate a larger demographic. Nevertheless, excellent work. If I saw it on a shelf, I'd buy it for my boyfriend.
But then, the weakness of this concept is that it doesn't relate to real world, like most students exercises. It's purely stylistic but doesn't command attention, other than the curiosity it provokes.
Every customers are used to buy one or two brands at most in this category and they are perfectly aware about the features they are looking for. And unless you are going to the toilet at Wendy's, no one use one ply toilet paper...
If existing products are using cats, teddy bears and muse to sell their products, it's because people wants their anus to be treated nicely, not with industrial looking packaging. But this kind of design would work well at Staples to sale photocopy paper.
1) The "number idea" is a great one, but the edges are much too sharp and I don't want the word "sharp" coming to my mind when I think of toilet tissue.
2) When I very first saw this photo, I thought of a CD duplicator or some kind of machine that does something with CD's. So, I think the artist should seriously consider adding some definition to the actual roll of tissue. Doing so would even soften up those sharp edges created by the numbers.
3) TERRIBLE choice of colors! All I can think of is shit! My advice, pick a more unisex color scheme.
What about women who look at this packaging, they'll be immediately turned off and if you ask me, WOMEN use more tissue than men. That hasn't been scientifically proven, but I think it's true!